It dawned on me the other day that I was much more passionate about new release cards back in 2011. Inspired by the pending arrival of my son that July, I had just gotten back into our glorious hobby after nearly two decades of complete cardboard nothingness. Essentially, I collecting like a chicken with his head cut off those first few months back in the fray. I was buying a little of this and a little of that but buying some of everything that came out. Unfortunately, this didn't last long enough to include 2011 Topps Update (TROUT!), but that's another discussion.
To show for my economic contributions, I am very proud to have a complete, hand-collated "birth year" set of 2011 flagship and Archives for my son to flip through one day and enjoy (or trade for a video game, or sell for beer money, whatever path he takes). I am also darn near close to completing the Heritage and Gypsy Queen sets from that year - with one and twelve cards remaining, respectively. Check out my NEEDS list and see if we can help each other! Not too bad though, overall.
But as you can divulge from my posts over the years since, my personal collecting habits have begun to steer away from modern releases. There's a myriad of reasons - some quite empirical while others are a bit more philosophical. It can be expensive to complete sets, pack by blaster by pack. Especially when you can just drop a little over $20 and bring entire Series home with no collating fuss and shipping included. The sellers usually even throw in a nice box. It's quite the inner conflict for this Collector, I assure you.
Because I still like to open packs of baseball cards!
There's still that rush to be had and, truth be told, there are still some pretty cool cards being made from a design perspective. The return on investment has become awfully risky, but there's no doubting the quality of photography and overall card construction for most sets...for the most part.
Enter son #2.
My family welcomed our third child into the world back in March, It's been a glorious, chaotic and beautiful circus ever since as we figure out life as a family of 5. I wouldn't trade it for the world! And since I'm a fair and just father (or at least strive to be), I can't help but look upon those great hand-collated sets from 2011 in my Card Cave. And then I look at what I'm doing for my youngest...and then I feel the itch to right the wrong....
And then I find myself in the card aisle at Target with a blaster of 2015 Gypsy Queen in my hand!
Yep. I'm at it again - officially, I'm announcing that I will be pursuing the complete base set of 2015 GQ for my kid. I have a long way to go after only (6?) or so rack-packs, but I figure that I have some time. I'm not sure if I'll chase all of the SP's like I did in 2011. I can't afford to make the rookie mistake again of buying all GQ blasters in the state, as much as I'd like to...and that's okay. I think everyone will understand.
In the meantime, it was a lot of fun to rip some packs and explore the latest edition of a set that is very sentimental to me. Here's a quick glance at some of my favorites:
The Shelby Miller represents what is probably my biggest "hit" of the rack packs, being a #'d /199 mini parallel. I'm a Braves fan, so this was a nice little bonus and the GQ mini's have slowly earned my appreciation over the years. I wish I could go back to 2011 when I amassed a considerable portion of a complete set of mini's. I didn't really understand what they were or how special it would have been to gather the whole run, so I ended up trading many away. That's okay - all part of the process.
BOOM! The next best thing to pulling a Brave is pulling THE Brave that managed to elude the Atlanta front-office rebuilding cyclone last off season and one of my top Player Collections - Freddie Freeman! This mini is a great addition and I can't wait to "binderize" the Freeman stack that sits atop the Card Cave table of chaos. Here's a look at the back of these cards, because I really love the GQ backs, despite their stat-less existence:
I thought this was a pretty cool insert as well:
Undoubtedly a vintage, throw-back insert set that I need to go research on Cardboard Connection, I enjoy the simplistic old-time feel of this art card. It's also a mini parallel, so unless I decide to go all out for mini completion, I might end up swapping this one out for regular sized cards that I need for my set-building efforts. Here's the back, so that we can all learn about "Crowding the plate":
Moving on from the smaller cards, here is a regular-sized insert card of Robbie Cano entitled, "Pillars of the Community". What a great concept for a baseball card! We're often inundated with only the very worst news and stories regarding our diamond heroes but Topps has decided to swim upstream and provide an encouraging look at some charitable efforts being made by ball players in their teams' communities.
Concept aside, this is a beautiful card. The image of Seattle is really sharp and means a little bit more to me as a former resident. I wonder if there was a discussion about working SAFECO Field into the background? In the end, I believe the Space Needle works better as the most iconic landmark for the Emerald City. At least they didn't go with the original Starbucks, am I right?
Here's the back of the "Pillars" Cano card:
I first noticed "celebration" and "walk-off" cards in the Opening Day and flagship sets a couple of years ago and I was immediately a fan. I think these types of cards capture the best parts of baseball - teamwork, family, competition, achieving your goal, having fun, etc. I think the concept works well in the Gypsy Queen format and this Royals card is a great example. Like the Pillars card above, I can't wait to see other cards from this insert set. Enjoy:
As I've mentioned before, I enjoy cards that pay tribute to a specific game or event and take care to match relevant images with relevant card-back write-ups. This GQ Walk-Off Winners card delivers on both accounts when I flipped this card over:
Part of the marketing effort by Topps includes the "bonus" pack of white-bordered parallel cards that accompany each rack pack. Sometimes these annoy me - other times, they look really nice and end up serving as excellent TTM material. I admit, the crisp white borders do look pretty nice - and are always welcome when they surround a new Mike Trout card:
Here's another white parallel that I thought looked awfully sharp:
In addition to the Freddie shown above, I had another great pack-ripping moment when I pulled an Anthony Rizzo base card! Yes, I am old and still get excited about base cards of my favorite players - no shame in my collecting game. Of course, now I need another one if I am going to "finish the race" and set this one aside for my son's set. Good thing I love the little guy :)
Here's the back - are the GQ card-back write-ups getting shorter? I know they were always succinct by design, but this one seems fairly random (which I do appreciate) and sparse at only four lines with additional blank space to be had towards the bottom. Thoughts?
Okay, so I have some work ahead of me to get my 2015 GQ NEEDS List posted, but hopefully I can stay the course and make a best effort to pull together some nice birth year sets for my youngest boy. Feel free to drop me a note if you think we can work out a swap. Long live set-building!
Thanks for reading -
Ryan
Showing posts with label Set Building. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Set Building. Show all posts
Thursday, July 2, 2015
Friday, June 19, 2015
The Quest for '60 - Visiting Vintage Heaven
A recent post by my friend William over at foulbunt.blogspot.com motivated me to finally make a pilgrimage to the hobby and collecting treasure that is the "Columbia Antique Mall" (also known as "Chic Antiques") in Columbia, South Carolina.
While the entire business covers a wide-range of treasures that fill two cavernous warehouses, my favorite part is the incredible sports cards & memorabilia collection that belongs to one of the proprietors, Conrad. Conrad has been collecting sports cards and memorabilia his entire life and has built an amazing catalog of inventory that focuses mostly on vintage baseball cards. His display cases are filled with stacks of vintage HOF cards. Each card resides within its own top-loader (and is typically penny-sleeved within, as well) and is adorned with a small post-it note that provides a "book value" and his price.
Yes, the "BV" is typically the "Hi Value" from Beckett and the cards rarely approach the necessary conditions to demand the high price, but this provides a good starting point for collectors like me to perform a quick condition assessment and see if we're in the ballpark for comparison with his price. It's a very convenient way to start the conversation or at least decide if you'd like for Conrad (or another employee) to take out a card for a closer look. It's important to note that Conrad is always willing to listen to reasonable offers below his listed price. This is crucial in mind and it can really add to your comfort level when you're assessing higher value cards. Condition, price and "worth" are all very subjective (as we all know), so this approach is very conducive to encouraging happy outcomes for both stakeholders.
Anyways, as luck would have it, I missed Conrad when I went to visit last week. He was enjoying some time on the golf course while I was enjoying some time around his vintage cardboard. While I was sad that I missed him, I think we were both pretty happy (and I was jealous of his time on the links!) with our situation. Determined to make the best use of my rare visit, I asked the very nice lady who was working (she is actually the shop's art consultant) if I could see Conrad's boxes of 1960 Topps cards.
That's right. Boxes. Here's one of them:
Yes, the shop has several glass display cases that are jam-packed with beautiful individual cards - but the true value of this cardboard heaven is the "back room" where Conrad has amassed dozens upon dozens of 5,000 count boxes that are both completely organized (by year, brand and in numeric order!) and completely filled with cards from the Tobacco era on up...it's amazing! Do you need some '67 Topps cards? No problem - BOOM - here's a few thousand cards to look through and find what you need. It's really something.
Again, the cards aren't in mint condition, but that's not the point. It's a BOUNTY of vintage cardboard that is well organized and reasonably priced for you to select yourself and TAKE HOME that day without the cost of shipping and knowing FULL WELL what you just paid for. With the LCS apocalypse in our rear view mirror and card shows being few and far between in my area, Conrad's shop is a godsend - particularly when I'm on a mission to complete my Dad's 1960 Topps set. I hadn't crossed off any cards from that list in some time - and time is precious.
I found 26 cards that day, whittling my NEEDS list down to 59 cards! I even had the luxury of selecting the 'best' conditioned copy when Conrad's stash produced more than one for me to consider. When it comes to searching for vintage needs, that has to be a rare treat. I only wish I had visited Conrad more often over the previous four years since we moved into the Columbia area. Here are all of the options I had to consider for card #129, the rookie card of Bob Hartman:
Since Conrad was hitting the links that day, he had to think quickly on his feet when the art consultant called him for pricing. She hung up the phone and quoted me $2 per card.
In retrospect, I really should have taken it.
But no, I was trying to be conservative and careful - which I can't really feel too guilty about. The family budget is as meticulously constructed as ever with our new addition in March. So I countered the $52 price tag with just over a buck a card at $30. You see, I was focused on the fact that several of the cards I had selected were severely creased and a majority of the checklists I had pulled were completely (albeit sentimentally) marked on by collectors from days long gone by. The centering was also quite rough for many of the cards, in the tradition of 1960 Topps! Here are the team cards that pulled double duty as checklists:
Aren't they beautiful? You can see the creases but there's nothing that really detracts away from your enjoyment and viewing of the cards. Not to mention, Conrad informed me that these checklists (in addition to the Coaches cards that I'll show in a moment) can be a little tough to find. I didn't know that, but appreciate his knowledge. Here are the backs of the team cards:
As you can see, only one out of the four checklists escaped being inked. And the one clean checklist is the Senators cards which, is VERY cool, but is also one of the cards with a significant crease on the front. Not ideal, but not something out of the ordinary for these 55-year old checklists. And while the marked-up checklists aren't desirable from a value and condition perspective, they did give me a chuckle when I realized how elusive the 'star' cards were for our collecting ancestors. Check it out:
Check out the All-Star portion of the list at the bottom of the card - no Eddie Mathews, Ernie Banks, Mickey Mantle, Roger Maris or Hank Aaron (sad trombone sound) for the kid I imagine to have been tracking his progress decades ago...while our hero DID manage to obtain the two Willie's and the Al Kaline, I can still picture him mumbling as he ripped packs that fall (late summer?) and wondering if he would EVER pull what he needed. Good stuff.
Speaking of good stuff, let's see what else I managed to find. Here are those Coaches cards I was talking about earlier. Hard to find, these gems deliver a a unique opportunity to snag some vintage of legendary players at a severe discount to cards from their playing days. Are you a fan of Yankee greats like Bill Dickey (HOF), Ralph Houk, Ed Lopat or Frank Crosetti? Get 'em all on one card!
With the white borders, it's easy to see that centering is a challenge with all of these cards and there are plenty of dog ears and creases to go around, too. While it factored into my initial offer for the cards, it didn't really matter as far as my desire to set aside and hope to utilize in my quest. Here is the next batch, a couple of coveted high numbers:
Yes! These two come from the seventh and final "high number", short-printed (SP!) series released by Topps for the 1960 set. The entire series consisted of 66 cards, #507 through #572. This Amoros and K-Mac represent numbers 531 and 534, respectively. of the 59 cards remaining on my NEED list, nearly half of them (28) come from this 7th Series. Therefore, the severe cross-diagonal crease on K-MAC and Sandy's <80-20 centering didn't even matter when I decided to buy or not...but again, it did factor into my offer.
Onward. How about some 'stars' that revealed themselves in the troughs of those 5,000 count boxes? Were there any notable players? I would argue that EVERY player in an old vintage set is notable...but there were certainly some bigger names. Here you go:
While Senator Bunning is the only official Hall of Fame inductee in this trio, the other two can be seriously viewed on a level playing field. Gil Hodges has continued to flirt with induction for decades and Big Klu has certainly earned his spot in the lore of the White Stockings. Ted led the league in long balls one season and was a multiple All-Star selection and World Champion. Gil slugged four home runs in one game a decade before this awkward mugshot was released (1950) and also boasts a hat trick of gold gloves to go with his All-Star selections and World Series rings. Both players have their numbers retired by their clubs. Good stuff! Bad centering...but fantastic baseball cards.
How about some inserts?
While the entire business covers a wide-range of treasures that fill two cavernous warehouses, my favorite part is the incredible sports cards & memorabilia collection that belongs to one of the proprietors, Conrad. Conrad has been collecting sports cards and memorabilia his entire life and has built an amazing catalog of inventory that focuses mostly on vintage baseball cards. His display cases are filled with stacks of vintage HOF cards. Each card resides within its own top-loader (and is typically penny-sleeved within, as well) and is adorned with a small post-it note that provides a "book value" and his price.
Yes, the "BV" is typically the "Hi Value" from Beckett and the cards rarely approach the necessary conditions to demand the high price, but this provides a good starting point for collectors like me to perform a quick condition assessment and see if we're in the ballpark for comparison with his price. It's a very convenient way to start the conversation or at least decide if you'd like for Conrad (or another employee) to take out a card for a closer look. It's important to note that Conrad is always willing to listen to reasonable offers below his listed price. This is crucial in mind and it can really add to your comfort level when you're assessing higher value cards. Condition, price and "worth" are all very subjective (as we all know), so this approach is very conducive to encouraging happy outcomes for both stakeholders.
Anyways, as luck would have it, I missed Conrad when I went to visit last week. He was enjoying some time on the golf course while I was enjoying some time around his vintage cardboard. While I was sad that I missed him, I think we were both pretty happy (and I was jealous of his time on the links!) with our situation. Determined to make the best use of my rare visit, I asked the very nice lady who was working (she is actually the shop's art consultant) if I could see Conrad's boxes of 1960 Topps cards.
That's right. Boxes. Here's one of them:
![]() |
| A few Moose among rows and rows of beautiful vintage cardboard |
Yes, the shop has several glass display cases that are jam-packed with beautiful individual cards - but the true value of this cardboard heaven is the "back room" where Conrad has amassed dozens upon dozens of 5,000 count boxes that are both completely organized (by year, brand and in numeric order!) and completely filled with cards from the Tobacco era on up...it's amazing! Do you need some '67 Topps cards? No problem - BOOM - here's a few thousand cards to look through and find what you need. It's really something.
Again, the cards aren't in mint condition, but that's not the point. It's a BOUNTY of vintage cardboard that is well organized and reasonably priced for you to select yourself and TAKE HOME that day without the cost of shipping and knowing FULL WELL what you just paid for. With the LCS apocalypse in our rear view mirror and card shows being few and far between in my area, Conrad's shop is a godsend - particularly when I'm on a mission to complete my Dad's 1960 Topps set. I hadn't crossed off any cards from that list in some time - and time is precious.
I found 26 cards that day, whittling my NEEDS list down to 59 cards! I even had the luxury of selecting the 'best' conditioned copy when Conrad's stash produced more than one for me to consider. When it comes to searching for vintage needs, that has to be a rare treat. I only wish I had visited Conrad more often over the previous four years since we moved into the Columbia area. Here are all of the options I had to consider for card #129, the rookie card of Bob Hartman:
![]() |
| Let me know if you need a Bob Hartman, too! |
Since Conrad was hitting the links that day, he had to think quickly on his feet when the art consultant called him for pricing. She hung up the phone and quoted me $2 per card.
In retrospect, I really should have taken it.
But no, I was trying to be conservative and careful - which I can't really feel too guilty about. The family budget is as meticulously constructed as ever with our new addition in March. So I countered the $52 price tag with just over a buck a card at $30. You see, I was focused on the fact that several of the cards I had selected were severely creased and a majority of the checklists I had pulled were completely (albeit sentimentally) marked on by collectors from days long gone by. The centering was also quite rough for many of the cards, in the tradition of 1960 Topps! Here are the team cards that pulled double duty as checklists:
Aren't they beautiful? You can see the creases but there's nothing that really detracts away from your enjoyment and viewing of the cards. Not to mention, Conrad informed me that these checklists (in addition to the Coaches cards that I'll show in a moment) can be a little tough to find. I didn't know that, but appreciate his knowledge. Here are the backs of the team cards:
![]() |
| I enjoyed seeing the variations in "marking" techniques on three of these four checklists! |
As you can see, only one out of the four checklists escaped being inked. And the one clean checklist is the Senators cards which, is VERY cool, but is also one of the cards with a significant crease on the front. Not ideal, but not something out of the ordinary for these 55-year old checklists. And while the marked-up checklists aren't desirable from a value and condition perspective, they did give me a chuckle when I realized how elusive the 'star' cards were for our collecting ancestors. Check it out:
![]() |
| I am proud to carry on this set-build quest today, 55 years later! |
Check out the All-Star portion of the list at the bottom of the card - no Eddie Mathews, Ernie Banks, Mickey Mantle, Roger Maris or Hank Aaron (sad trombone sound) for the kid I imagine to have been tracking his progress decades ago...while our hero DID manage to obtain the two Willie's and the Al Kaline, I can still picture him mumbling as he ripped packs that fall (late summer?) and wondering if he would EVER pull what he needed. Good stuff.
Speaking of good stuff, let's see what else I managed to find. Here are those Coaches cards I was talking about earlier. Hard to find, these gems deliver a a unique opportunity to snag some vintage of legendary players at a severe discount to cards from their playing days. Are you a fan of Yankee greats like Bill Dickey (HOF), Ralph Houk, Ed Lopat or Frank Crosetti? Get 'em all on one card!
![]() |
| Floating heads - never a bad idea. |
With the white borders, it's easy to see that centering is a challenge with all of these cards and there are plenty of dog ears and creases to go around, too. While it factored into my initial offer for the cards, it didn't really matter as far as my desire to set aside and hope to utilize in my quest. Here is the next batch, a couple of coveted high numbers:
![]() |
| SP's - not JUST your modern card gimmick! |
Yes! These two come from the seventh and final "high number", short-printed (SP!) series released by Topps for the 1960 set. The entire series consisted of 66 cards, #507 through #572. This Amoros and K-Mac represent numbers 531 and 534, respectively. of the 59 cards remaining on my NEED list, nearly half of them (28) come from this 7th Series. Therefore, the severe cross-diagonal crease on K-MAC and Sandy's <80-20 centering didn't even matter when I decided to buy or not...but again, it did factor into my offer.
Onward. How about some 'stars' that revealed themselves in the troughs of those 5,000 count boxes? Were there any notable players? I would argue that EVERY player in an old vintage set is notable...but there were certainly some bigger names. Here you go:
While Senator Bunning is the only official Hall of Fame inductee in this trio, the other two can be seriously viewed on a level playing field. Gil Hodges has continued to flirt with induction for decades and Big Klu has certainly earned his spot in the lore of the White Stockings. Ted led the league in long balls one season and was a multiple All-Star selection and World Champion. Gil slugged four home runs in one game a decade before this awkward mugshot was released (1950) and also boasts a hat trick of gold gloves to go with his All-Star selections and World Series rings. Both players have their numbers retired by their clubs. Good stuff! Bad centering...but fantastic baseball cards.
How about some inserts?
Hey, there's the WINNING Hartman out of the multitude of options pictured above! The Pascual All-Star card is a great pick-up but has some surface loss in the lower right. This was probably the toughest card I had to accept that day, but in light of the circumstances, there was no way I could leave it behind when I am so close to the finish line.
The Baxes card is really stunning! It's surface is clean, the edges are sharp and you can see that the centering 7 corners aren't too bad either. I like the red and blue color scheme that seems to work very well with the old-school tribe cap. And that GIANT ROOKIE CUP - awesome. Just awesome. In fact, there's even more glorious baseball history wrapped up in that Baxes card that I plan to share in a later post. Stay tuned! It will be Hoot...
The Moose card was a nice surprise in the box, too. Skowron is considered by most to be a pretty memorable star, even among the crowded memories in Yankee Stadium. I can't believe that my old man (a Yankees fan) had never gotten around to trading for the entire Yankees team set, but there you go. The checklist doesn't lie...and cool is it that I can now wrap it up for him? Gives me chills.
And now, for the Best Supporting Actors:
![]() |
| Has anybody ever referred to '60 as the Skittles set? If not, I'm coining it! |
A few of these are pretty stunning cards. I was able to, once again, fish around through dozens of duplicates and compare until my OCD-collector's heart was content. What great way to spend a lunch break, right?! Though deemed to be "commons" by the harsh reference documents of our Hobby, the colors are vibrant and the creases are minimal...heck, there are even a couple of sharp corners in this batch.
And so there you go! I set these 26 cards aside and asked the art consultant for pen and paper so that I might leave a thank you, offer, and explanation for Conrad to consider. I also added an EPIC Hall of Famer vintage rookie card to the stack but I'll cover that gem later.
As respectfully as I could and laying out the reasons for my math, I made my offer of $30 for the 26 1960 cards. I knew it was conservative, but I also didn't know how strongly Conrad felt about the thousands of cards he kept boxed up in the back room. Was every card an individual treasure to him or were these separated out from the display cases and tucked away for a reason? In essence, Conrad and I would be getting to know each other during this, our first transaction...
I received a call the following afternoon and Conrad was very gracious as he chuckled.
"You should have taken the $2/card price and run away!"
I smiled and asked him what he was thinking...he went on to go through each of my 26 cards and explain their relevance within the set. The rarity of inserts and the hard-to-find nature of the checklists, coaches cards and SPs. His math began by adding up the maximum (remember, Beckett "HI") value for each card as a point of reference - this reached over $200, my friends, so my $30 offer obviously looked a little wimpy in contrast. Of course, the cards I was buying wouldn't come close to that value - and he recognized that. We began to discuss a middle ground. I reminded him that several of the rare/high dollar checklists were actually marked on, effectively rendering them down to the basement levels. He kindly agreed and continued to work with me on the price, though he did remind me that it was important to consider rarity. I nodded my head in agreement and reassured him over the phone, "I definitely understand what you're saying, Conrad."
I could go on, but I'll spare you the agony. In the end, we agreed upon a price of about $75 for the lot - just a little bit under $3 per card. On one hand, it was a little painful to see my original offer tripled...but my conversation with Conrad and the undeniable value associated with being able to cross these cards, some of them quite tough to find, off the list of this very special collecting mission made it easy to acquiesce in the end.
We had a deal.
During my search, I had a very pleasant conversation with art consultant regarding Conrad's collection and the man himself. She revealed that Conrad loved a good cup of coffee - black, nothing special. So, after we agreed on the price, I assured Conrad that I would stop by as soon as possible complete the purchase and that I would have a steaming cup of coffee for him. He gave another warm chuckle and we exchanged our goodbyes.
A great experience!
In the end, I feel like a still got a great deal. I feel like I gained some perspective during this process and learned a little bit more about this part of the hobby that I love so much. Vintage, set-building and some great conversation. What could be better? Hopefully, Conrad will still greet me as a friend and fellow collector the next time I bring him a cup of coffee. I think he will.
What do you guys think? Was it a fair deal for both sides in the end? Do you have any similar tales of vintage hunting and lot-purchasing of old "raw" cards? Let me know what you think and feel free to check out my "Set NEEDS" tab to see if we can help each other!
Thank you for a great experience, Conrad! Here's hoping that our next chance to sit and talk cards isn't too far away. Besides, there's that gorgeous '76 Mike Schmidt card..and my insane idea that I am building the 1959 set...and...
Thanks for reading!
Ryan
Monday, August 11, 2014
A Red Rizzo from The Lost Collector!
My friend AJ (who runs the great blog The Lost Collector) sent over a splendid card for my Anthony Rizzo Collection!
I love Heritage and am still slowly trying to BUILD this year's base set! Honest, I checked for a pulse and it's still there.....barely. I hope I can stick to it. Set-Building is something I do enjoy but view as a challenge for both modern sets and vintage. Vintage is tough because I lack a local shop for access to reasonable selections of commons....modern releases suffer the same handicap but I also don't find the math for packs/boxes of new releases to be very favorable for dinosaurs like me.
Maybe I'm just being a wimp? Sorry. Tangent.....
This Rizzo parallel won't be needed for the set-chase, but it is a WELCOME addition to my Rizzo PC! It's a simple head-shot of my favorite Chicago Cub. The red even works pretty well with the Cubbies uniform and logo. Love it!
I also appreciate The Lost Collector's use of the painter's tape. I try to do the same as much as possible. It gets the job done without leaving a sticky residue on the top-loaders. A win-win. Let's get that tape out of the way for a better view:
Fantastic - and how about those great Heritage backs:
Check it out.....
I love Heritage and am still slowly trying to BUILD this year's base set! Honest, I checked for a pulse and it's still there.....barely. I hope I can stick to it. Set-Building is something I do enjoy but view as a challenge for both modern sets and vintage. Vintage is tough because I lack a local shop for access to reasonable selections of commons....modern releases suffer the same handicap but I also don't find the math for packs/boxes of new releases to be very favorable for dinosaurs like me.
Maybe I'm just being a wimp? Sorry. Tangent.....
This Rizzo parallel won't be needed for the set-chase, but it is a WELCOME addition to my Rizzo PC! It's a simple head-shot of my favorite Chicago Cub. The red even works pretty well with the Cubbies uniform and logo. Love it!
I also appreciate The Lost Collector's use of the painter's tape. I try to do the same as much as possible. It gets the job done without leaving a sticky residue on the top-loaders. A win-win. Let's get that tape out of the way for a better view:
Fantastic - and how about those great Heritage backs:
NICE!
A great description of a "Rizzo Moonshot" is very apropos in light of his power surge this season. I also appreciate the reminder about just how young Anthony really is.
A great card. Thanks, AJ! Now where did I put that spare PWE.......
Saturday, May 24, 2014
My HOF Collection - 1959 Topps #212 "Fence Busters" Hank Aaron & Eddie Mathews
Am I building the 1959 Topps set?!?!?!?!
I didn't mean to start. I can't afford to, can I? How could I ever be so....so, bold?
EH, to heck with it. I'm a collector and a set-builder at that. It may take me 40 years, I may never finish it....but nothing can stop me from starting a list, right? Right. Let's add this one to my short, but growing stack!
I picked up this card for less than $8 if I remember correctly. A deal, if you ask me! It's got the all too frequent snow of the 1958 and 1959 Topps sets, but when that snow gently surrounds the gathering of two Hall of Fame players like Mathews and Aaron - you just don't care!
"Fence Busters" indeed, this card pays homage to the HR and RBI category totals for the two sluggers during their 1958 campaign. 30 and 95 for Hank......31 and 77 for Edie. The blazing yellow sun centered between the two players keeps the design consistent with the rest of the set, though this disk was where the player's photograph was inserted for the base cards. For card #212, it creates a slightly bizarre, almost spaghetti-western kind of sunset effect....but this intimate portrait of two great ballplayers and teammates bests any grievances from the design or background color department.
The card is in fairly decent shape, too! Centering can be tough for '59's, but the white border is shared well by all four sides of the card. The corners aren't too badly rounded either. Here's a glance at the back:
The back is in great shape, with no stains or marks to impede appreciation of another gem of a vintage card back from Topps:
"...a terror to opponents when World Series time rolls around..." Ha! Until the Yanks in '58!
"...belted a torrid .393 with 3 homers and 7 Runs Batted In..." - I need to use "torrid" more often!
"...last year...posted a .333 against the Yanks..." - wait, WHAT? :)
"Eddie is the best bunter on the Braves." - (sad trombone sound)
Not the best highlight for a "Fence Busters" card but, hey. We're all about reporting the facts. Mathews did more fence busting in '58 than Aaron, but is clear where the majority of the hobby and fandom zeal was aimed. No problem! It is at is always will be....Interestingly, as a side note, the cartoon baseball player at the bottom of the card doesn't depict any fence-busting, either.
Nerd-details aside, this is a great card and I am thrilled to add it to my HOF collection as well as my infant 1959 Topps set. Keep your eyes peeled for a NEEDS List, my friends!
Thanks for reading and keep collecting!
Ryan
Monday, May 12, 2014
Some 2011 Gypsy Queen Help from the Daily Dimwit!
Sam over at The Daily Dimwit was kind enough to send over a few cards that I needed for my 2011 Gypsy Queen collection. Sam and I both share a love of that set, the very first of the Gypsy Queen releases. It holds a special place in my collecting heart as THE first cards that purchased when returning to the hobby after a 20+ year hiatus. If only I had stashed away a few more blasters......
Sam has an AMAZING close master set of 2011 Gypsy Queen. Relics, framed mini's, mini's, parallels, autographs.....ALL OF IT. He lacks only a couple of white whales, and by that I mean cards like the Koufax autograph, Hank Aaron auto, etc. It's incredible and a true testament to the set-builder and collector that Sam is. Sam's also just a good guy....one of the first that welcomed me into our modern hobby digital community.
I made the mistake of not holding on to all of my mini cards. I still have a bunch, but as I was not quite sure how to handle these odd-sized micro cards (no such thing existed in my previous collecting life?!), I sent off many of them to good homes in the form of trades or goodwill packages.
That being said, I was all about the insert sets and SPs. In fact, I wasn't even quite sure what a "SP" was, but I think this may have worked in my favor. Kind of an 'ignorance is bliss' sort of event. I never got frustrated over how challenging it was to find these 50 cards, I simply kept hunting as a happy, numerically and linearly-inclined set-builder.
Man, those were the days!
Anyways, I still need a couple inserts and SPs but thanks to Sam, I can now cross these off the list. Thanks, Sam!
Sam has an AMAZING close master set of 2011 Gypsy Queen. Relics, framed mini's, mini's, parallels, autographs.....ALL OF IT. He lacks only a couple of white whales, and by that I mean cards like the Koufax autograph, Hank Aaron auto, etc. It's incredible and a true testament to the set-builder and collector that Sam is. Sam's also just a good guy....one of the first that welcomed me into our modern hobby digital community.
I made the mistake of not holding on to all of my mini cards. I still have a bunch, but as I was not quite sure how to handle these odd-sized micro cards (no such thing existed in my previous collecting life?!), I sent off many of them to good homes in the form of trades or goodwill packages.
That being said, I was all about the insert sets and SPs. In fact, I wasn't even quite sure what a "SP" was, but I think this may have worked in my favor. Kind of an 'ignorance is bliss' sort of event. I never got frustrated over how challenging it was to find these 50 cards, I simply kept hunting as a happy, numerically and linearly-inclined set-builder.
Man, those were the days!
Anyways, I still need a couple inserts and SPs but thanks to Sam, I can now cross these off the list. Thanks, Sam!
| OH, did I leave a glare on Buchholz's card or is that just a foreign substance? |
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Oh, To Be Set Build'n Again: 2014 Heritage Edition
Thanks to a great trade with @SWLVguy via twitter, I'm able to add this nice stack of fabulously thick-card stock to my initial '14 Heritage blaster hauls:
Alright! Thanks for the great swap, C.......
If anybody has any extra Heritage base (or SPs) that they don't need for their own collections, I would be very interested. Please check out my NEEDS/FOR TRADE page and let me know if we can help each other out.
Thanks for reading and keep collecting!
Ryan
Friday, March 28, 2014
2014 Topps Heritage - The Decision to Build
They got me again with their card stock tractor beam!
If you follow my ramblings on Twitter, you know that I am a big time nerd, play fantasy sports and recently had a lot to say about the new Heritage set from Topps. I picked up a few rack packs from Wally Mart on that post-release Monday to check them out. I love the 1965 design but, for some reason, I need my Heritage cards to be printed upon that nice thick card stock that disappeared during last year's Heritage release. Yes, I know that some of that stock swapping has to do with actual historical accuracy.....ridiculous notion for a product called "Heritage"!
The result?
I love them! The pictures and images for these cards are as BLAND as ever. So simple, so staged and....so weirdly perfect. That card stock is nice and thick and when you take a whiff of a fat stack of these bad boys - it's nothing but pulpy, cardboard-y goodness. Where are you going? No slippery gloss and syrupy odor 'round here. No serial numbers or super-short printed action/logo variation cards in my packs...
So, why do I love them? Again, these are just simple baseball cards....but that's exactly what I like to collect sometimes, particularly when I'm building a set. I pulled 76 base cards out of 4 packs in addition to 4 inserts (a couple of which I liked). No duplicates! Wait...upon further reflection, I think that stack of 76 included 3 SPs, one of which was my ONLY colored parallel. I like those numbers. I also love card backs from the days of yore - and these are a perfect example. The drawings and cartoon-ish font upon a sea of baby-blue.......dude, what could be better? Sure, a relic or an autograph or a card with an old postage stamp would have been cool to pull (and helped me reclaim some of the investment) but I am quite content and now, perhaps foolishly, on a mission to build the set!
I am a little disappointed in the fact that Topps decided to place a high percentage of star players in the SP portion of the release. I think this is a huge mistake and a potential trend that could really damage the hobby - let's hope it doesn't persist!
Let me know if you have any cards from this set to trade, sell, whatever. I will post my NEEDS list in a new tab to the right - my first new tab in quite awhile. Check it out! I will try to keep it updated as best I can and begin to list duplicates that I have for trade if/when they arrive.
Keep collecting!
Ryan
| I normally don't do racks, but when I do...I do 'em big. |
If you follow my ramblings on Twitter, you know that I am a big time nerd, play fantasy sports and recently had a lot to say about the new Heritage set from Topps. I picked up a few rack packs from Wally Mart on that post-release Monday to check them out. I love the 1965 design but, for some reason, I need my Heritage cards to be printed upon that nice thick card stock that disappeared during last year's Heritage release. Yes, I know that some of that stock swapping has to do with actual historical accuracy.....ridiculous notion for a product called "Heritage"!
The result?
| Oso Blanco - Beard - Pennant - ROOKIE CUP combo in 1st pack NEVER HURTS |
| EXHIBIT A - Why a brand like Heritage is loved by collectors like me who value...old card backs |
I love them! The pictures and images for these cards are as BLAND as ever. So simple, so staged and....so weirdly perfect. That card stock is nice and thick and when you take a whiff of a fat stack of these bad boys - it's nothing but pulpy, cardboard-y goodness. Where are you going? No slippery gloss and syrupy odor 'round here. No serial numbers or super-short printed action/logo variation cards in my packs...
| Colon & Marichal - WHAT could be weirder? |
| Smile, Freddie. |
So, why do I love them? Again, these are just simple baseball cards....but that's exactly what I like to collect sometimes, particularly when I'm building a set. I pulled 76 base cards out of 4 packs in addition to 4 inserts (a couple of which I liked). No duplicates! Wait...upon further reflection, I think that stack of 76 included 3 SPs, one of which was my ONLY colored parallel. I like those numbers. I also love card backs from the days of yore - and these are a perfect example. The drawings and cartoon-ish font upon a sea of baby-blue.......dude, what could be better? Sure, a relic or an autograph or a card with an old postage stamp would have been cool to pull (and helped me reclaim some of the investment) but I am quite content and now, perhaps foolishly, on a mission to build the set!
I am a little disappointed in the fact that Topps decided to place a high percentage of star players in the SP portion of the release. I think this is a huge mistake and a potential trend that could really damage the hobby - let's hope it doesn't persist!
Let me know if you have any cards from this set to trade, sell, whatever. I will post my NEEDS list in a new tab to the right - my first new tab in quite awhile. Check it out! I will try to keep it updated as best I can and begin to list duplicates that I have for trade if/when they arrive.
Keep collecting!
Ryan
Friday, April 12, 2013
2013 Gypsy Queen: The Verdict & Trade Lists
I won't be collecting the 2013 Gypsy Queen base set.
Don't get me wrong, I picked up a blaster and enjoyed my packs. No wait....they were out of blasters. I snagged three "rack" packs....of packs.....not that it matters. I enjoyed checking the set out. There was a healthy dose of inserts and parallels throughout and I even pulled a Mattingly base card! Yep, I was mystified as to why the previous two editions of GQ blacklisted The Hit Man and even tweeted to @ToppsCards about it. Obviously, they listened to Ryan's Pitch and decided to include him in this year's release. I'm ecstatic to make it the latest addition to my Mattingly PC!
The cards were sorted and reviewed. By yours truly, so it was pretty technical.
I've set aside a few cards for my collection - mostly Braves, Yankees and a few legacy stars. But otherwise, the base card design just didn't do it for me. I don't necessarily hate it. Remember, the 2011 Gypsy Queen set was what welcomed me back into the hobby a couple of years ago ( my goodness!?). I pursued it with reckless abandon and flip back through my (almost complete!) master set on a regular basis. I dig the artistic nature of the cards' pictures and I really enjoy the mixture of current and past players. It's just that...the design of the cards aren't that much different, and I just don't think they have enough color. Or the right color, I guess, as the '11 versions were strictly tan and black:
Yeah, I don't get it either - I just enjoy the 2011 design much more. This latest attempt just seems more cheap and bland. And that's fine - you can't win them all. We'll try again next year.
In my opinion, Topps got it right with the initial release as far as base, relics, inserts and production numbers are concerned.
They took a step back last year with some inserts that just didn't appeal to me and a design that was so-so. There seemed to be a lot more "blah" names on the relic and autograph list, too. But I chased it anyways and have almost completed the base set.
This year, I think the inserts are spectacular for the most part and I will actually try to collect a few of them: "No Hitters", "Sliding Stars" and "Collisions at the Plate". I'm really glad that Topps brought back the 'Sliding Stars' inserts. I still dig them and the 'Collisions' was a great idea.
Therefore......I don't need all of the cards I have but I need some that I don't! The cards below are "For Trade" and can be yours if you need them - just let me know! If possible, I'd really like to swap them for cards I need.
Here's the situation:
For Trade
Base: 4, 7 (Mike Schmidt SP), 25, 43, 52, 59, 68, 88, 105, 129, 153, 165, 206, 214, 235,
241, 256, 261, 278, 338, 343, 345
White Parallel: Ben Revere (269), Alex Gordon (141), Darwin Barney (341), Jemile Weeks (214),
David Wright (37), Yonder Alonso (173), Chris Capuano (241)
Mini: CJ Wilson (224), Vida Blue (157)
Black Mini /199: Alex Rios (65/199, #114)
Dealing Aces: Stephen Strasburg, David Price
Glove Stories: Manny Machado
Cards I Need
Sliding Stars: Austin Jackson, Adam Jones, Andrew McCutchen, Bryce Harper, Carlos Gonzalez,
Derek Jeter, Jason Heyward, Joe Morgan, Ken Griffey Jr., Mike Trout, Ozzie Smith,
Prince Fielder, Rickey Henderson
Collisions at the Plate: McCann, Posey, Fisk, Carter, Bench, Montero, Rosario, Molina
No-Hitters: Feller, Hunter, Abbott, Santana, Weaver, Millwood, Ryan, Humber, Halladay, Koufax,
Spahn
For Yanks & Braves Team Sets, here is what I have (below). I will gladly take any that I don't have and any parallel version from my favorite teams!
Yanks
A-Rod (#6), Ivan Nova (#21), Paul O'Neill (#316)
Braves
Chris Johnson (#195), Craig Kimbrel (#257), Tim Hudson (#344)
Yanks & Braves Mini's & Parallels
Mariano Rivera (#86)
Thanks for reading guys - have a great weekend!
Don't get me wrong, I picked up a blaster and enjoyed my packs. No wait....they were out of blasters. I snagged three "rack" packs....of packs.....not that it matters. I enjoyed checking the set out. There was a healthy dose of inserts and parallels throughout and I even pulled a Mattingly base card! Yep, I was mystified as to why the previous two editions of GQ blacklisted The Hit Man and even tweeted to @ToppsCards about it. Obviously, they listened to Ryan's Pitch and decided to include him in this year's release. I'm ecstatic to make it the latest addition to my Mattingly PC!
The cards were sorted and reviewed. By yours truly, so it was pretty technical.
I've set aside a few cards for my collection - mostly Braves, Yankees and a few legacy stars. But otherwise, the base card design just didn't do it for me. I don't necessarily hate it. Remember, the 2011 Gypsy Queen set was what welcomed me back into the hobby a couple of years ago ( my goodness!?). I pursued it with reckless abandon and flip back through my (almost complete!) master set on a regular basis. I dig the artistic nature of the cards' pictures and I really enjoy the mixture of current and past players. It's just that...the design of the cards aren't that much different, and I just don't think they have enough color. Or the right color, I guess, as the '11 versions were strictly tan and black:
![]() |
| Gateway Set |
Yeah, I don't get it either - I just enjoy the 2011 design much more. This latest attempt just seems more cheap and bland. And that's fine - you can't win them all. We'll try again next year.
In my opinion, Topps got it right with the initial release as far as base, relics, inserts and production numbers are concerned.
![]() |
| Hawkish |
They took a step back last year with some inserts that just didn't appeal to me and a design that was so-so. There seemed to be a lot more "blah" names on the relic and autograph list, too. But I chased it anyways and have almost completed the base set.
![]() |
| Just.....no. |
This year, I think the inserts are spectacular for the most part and I will actually try to collect a few of them: "No Hitters", "Sliding Stars" and "Collisions at the Plate". I'm really glad that Topps brought back the 'Sliding Stars' inserts. I still dig them and the 'Collisions' was a great idea.
Therefore......I don't need all of the cards I have but I need some that I don't! The cards below are "For Trade" and can be yours if you need them - just let me know! If possible, I'd really like to swap them for cards I need.
Here's the situation:
For Trade
Base: 4, 7 (Mike Schmidt SP), 25, 43, 52, 59, 68, 88, 105, 129, 153, 165, 206, 214, 235,
241, 256, 261, 278, 338, 343, 345
White Parallel: Ben Revere (269), Alex Gordon (141), Darwin Barney (341), Jemile Weeks (214),
David Wright (37), Yonder Alonso (173), Chris Capuano (241)
Mini: CJ Wilson (224), Vida Blue (157)
Black Mini /199: Alex Rios (65/199, #114)
Dealing Aces: Stephen Strasburg, David Price
Glove Stories: Manny Machado
Cards I Need
Sliding Stars: Austin Jackson, Adam Jones, Andrew McCutchen, Bryce Harper, Carlos Gonzalez,
Derek Jeter, Jason Heyward, Joe Morgan, Ken Griffey Jr., Mike Trout, Ozzie Smith,
Prince Fielder, Rickey Henderson
Collisions at the Plate: McCann, Posey, Fisk, Carter, Bench, Montero, Rosario, Molina
No-Hitters: Feller, Hunter, Abbott, Santana, Weaver, Millwood, Ryan, Humber, Halladay, Koufax,
Spahn
For Yanks & Braves Team Sets, here is what I have (below). I will gladly take any that I don't have and any parallel version from my favorite teams!
Yanks
A-Rod (#6), Ivan Nova (#21), Paul O'Neill (#316)
Braves
Chris Johnson (#195), Craig Kimbrel (#257), Tim Hudson (#344)
Yanks & Braves Mini's & Parallels
Mariano Rivera (#86)
Thanks for reading guys - have a great weekend!
Friday, August 17, 2012
The Quest for '60: 1960 Topps #567 Sherm Lollar, All Star
This will hopefully be the first of many ""Quest for '60" posts that I'm able to share with you here at Ryan's Pitch.
1960 Topps baseball cards were the first vintage baseball cards that I ever saw and, very carefully, held in my hands. At some point during my childhood, my grandparents presented my father with two binders of sports cards - mostly baseball and a little bit of football. They were actually his old collection, salvaged from the meticulously and safely kept shoebox that had been gathering dust in my grandparents' homes since his childhood. He was thrilled but probably not as ecstatic as his eldest son......yours truly.
Those binders still blow my mind!
My old man was a Yankees fan so I get it honest. And fortunately for his collection, this means that there are several Mantles which graced the very first page of binder #1. An All-Star card, the 1960 base Mantle card.....three 1964 Mantles.....epic stuff. But the majority of the two binders is definitely 1960 Topps baseball cards. As a child, all I was concerned with were the Mantles and a couple of rookie cards (complete with a HUGE trophy on one of them!!!) for some dudes named McCovey and Yastrzemski. I quickly donated some of my top loaders and breathed a sigh of relief as these relics were gently lowered into safety.....even though they had survived in really good condition, for decades, within a plain old box. But I was a child collector of the Junk Wax era, so we were definitely at DEFCON 5 until they were properly 'stored'. Whew! My job was done and it is within those protective cases that those key cards still rest. They are Dad's cards and maybe one day (hopefully a long time from now) they will be passed down.
But how many cards did he have? Did he have a complete set? Was he close?
I didn't ask those questions twenty years ago and even if I had - would it have inspired me to take action? Based on my allowance at the time....most certainly not. But that was then. Fast forward to me as a grown up child. This past Christmas, I took the time to truly flip through ALL of the pages and look, for the first time, with my mature collecting eyes as to what Dad really had in those two binders. Gibson....Musial......Kaline.....many of the GREAT ones were there! Berra, Ford, Aaron....the awesomeness continued! I jotted down the numbers and collated as best I could. Page after page, I was like a monk salvaging ancient messages scribbled on scrolls of papyrus. Or something like that. You can find my results under the "Sets Needs" tab to the right - Dad is actually VERY close to completing the 1960 Topps set! Let me know if you can help, I am always up for a trade.
So, after all of that - I am now on my Quest for '60 and have set a goal to complete my Dad's partial 1960 Topps set.
Crazy? Probably. Yes, there are some mighty expensive cards left to be tracked down but at the same time, there are dozens and dozens of very reasonable "common" base cards that can be checked off the list, too. I fully recognize that this quest will take years and, potentially, decades. I would like to finish the set in a reasonable time frame so that my old man and I can enjoy its completion together. Here's hoping, for so many powerful reasons......
Enough background though - let's get to Mr. Lollar.
I found this Sherm Lollar All Star card for a great price AND it's in great condition AND I didn't know anything about Sherm Lollar.....but now I do and I am grateful for the learning experience. Here's a look at the front of this card, #567 from the set:
Shake off the iPhone "fish eye" effect and you can see what I mean - this wonderful old piece of cardboard is in GREAT condition. The corners are sharp and the colors are still vivid even 52 years later. Great edges and not even a hint of creasing. Good stuff - if only they could all be like this! Being number 567 from the set makes it a "High Series" card and therefore, more rare. So I'm really happy to cross it off the list.
But who is Shem Lollar?
You know those great ball players that seem to exist in the shadow of a better-known or only slightly better player from the same position? Sherm is one of those players. As it turn out, he was one of the finest catcher in the American League during the 1950's! Check these accolades out:
Sherm Lollar's career would take off, though and he would go on to play for the Browns and White Sox until 1963, spending the majority of that span in Chicago where he won all of his gold gloves and earned six of his All-Star selections. He was always regarded as a powerful hitter, even within the gigantic dimensions of Comiskey Park and is often cited as one of those players who garners serious consideration for posthumous entry into the Hall of Fame. I hope he gets his chance, one day. Here is the back of Sherm's All Star card:
When he retired in 1963, Lollar's career fielding percentage of .992 was the HIGHEST for a catcher in major league history. At the time of his retirement, he was also 5th on the all-time list for catching base runners throughout his career - nailing 46% of them! Way to go, Sherm!
I'm really glad to add another piece of the puzzle to my Quest for '60 and probably even more ecstatic that my quest has introduced me to Sherm Lollar - who I now know to be one of the greatest catchers during baseball's golden age.
Thanks for reading and have a great weekend!
1960 Topps baseball cards were the first vintage baseball cards that I ever saw and, very carefully, held in my hands. At some point during my childhood, my grandparents presented my father with two binders of sports cards - mostly baseball and a little bit of football. They were actually his old collection, salvaged from the meticulously and safely kept shoebox that had been gathering dust in my grandparents' homes since his childhood. He was thrilled but probably not as ecstatic as his eldest son......yours truly.
Those binders still blow my mind!
My old man was a Yankees fan so I get it honest. And fortunately for his collection, this means that there are several Mantles which graced the very first page of binder #1. An All-Star card, the 1960 base Mantle card.....three 1964 Mantles.....epic stuff. But the majority of the two binders is definitely 1960 Topps baseball cards. As a child, all I was concerned with were the Mantles and a couple of rookie cards (complete with a HUGE trophy on one of them!!!) for some dudes named McCovey and Yastrzemski. I quickly donated some of my top loaders and breathed a sigh of relief as these relics were gently lowered into safety.....even though they had survived in really good condition, for decades, within a plain old box. But I was a child collector of the Junk Wax era, so we were definitely at DEFCON 5 until they were properly 'stored'. Whew! My job was done and it is within those protective cases that those key cards still rest. They are Dad's cards and maybe one day (hopefully a long time from now) they will be passed down.
But how many cards did he have? Did he have a complete set? Was he close?
I didn't ask those questions twenty years ago and even if I had - would it have inspired me to take action? Based on my allowance at the time....most certainly not. But that was then. Fast forward to me as a grown up child. This past Christmas, I took the time to truly flip through ALL of the pages and look, for the first time, with my mature collecting eyes as to what Dad really had in those two binders. Gibson....Musial......Kaline.....many of the GREAT ones were there! Berra, Ford, Aaron....the awesomeness continued! I jotted down the numbers and collated as best I could. Page after page, I was like a monk salvaging ancient messages scribbled on scrolls of papyrus. Or something like that. You can find my results under the "Sets Needs" tab to the right - Dad is actually VERY close to completing the 1960 Topps set! Let me know if you can help, I am always up for a trade.
So, after all of that - I am now on my Quest for '60 and have set a goal to complete my Dad's partial 1960 Topps set.
Crazy? Probably. Yes, there are some mighty expensive cards left to be tracked down but at the same time, there are dozens and dozens of very reasonable "common" base cards that can be checked off the list, too. I fully recognize that this quest will take years and, potentially, decades. I would like to finish the set in a reasonable time frame so that my old man and I can enjoy its completion together. Here's hoping, for so many powerful reasons......
Enough background though - let's get to Mr. Lollar.
| What do you think of these 1960 All Star card designs? |
Shake off the iPhone "fish eye" effect and you can see what I mean - this wonderful old piece of cardboard is in GREAT condition. The corners are sharp and the colors are still vivid even 52 years later. Great edges and not even a hint of creasing. Good stuff - if only they could all be like this! Being number 567 from the set makes it a "High Series" card and therefore, more rare. So I'm really happy to cross it off the list.
But who is Shem Lollar?
You know those great ball players that seem to exist in the shadow of a better-known or only slightly better player from the same position? Sherm is one of those players. As it turn out, he was one of the finest catcher in the American League during the 1950's! Check these accolades out:
- 7 time All-Star
- 2 time World Series Champion (once as a player)
- 3 time Gold Glove Award Winner
Sherm Lollar's career would take off, though and he would go on to play for the Browns and White Sox until 1963, spending the majority of that span in Chicago where he won all of his gold gloves and earned six of his All-Star selections. He was always regarded as a powerful hitter, even within the gigantic dimensions of Comiskey Park and is often cited as one of those players who garners serious consideration for posthumous entry into the Hall of Fame. I hope he gets his chance, one day. Here is the back of Sherm's All Star card:
| Love the cartoon! "In a game...got two hits in an inning twice" |
When he retired in 1963, Lollar's career fielding percentage of .992 was the HIGHEST for a catcher in major league history. At the time of his retirement, he was also 5th on the all-time list for catching base runners throughout his career - nailing 46% of them! Way to go, Sherm!
I'm really glad to add another piece of the puzzle to my Quest for '60 and probably even more ecstatic that my quest has introduced me to Sherm Lollar - who I now know to be one of the greatest catchers during baseball's golden age.
Thanks for reading and have a great weekend!
Monday, February 13, 2012
Ask and You Shall Receive - 1991 Fleer
Wow. Just WOW.
I'm not sure how long it will take for me to get used to the generosity of my fellow collectors. Hopefully I never will, as it is a terrific reminder of what this hobby is all about. In my last post, I shot a signal flare into the night as a call for my quest to complete the '91 Fleer set.
And that call was answered.
To all who have offered their help - The Lost Collector, Foul Bunt, Captain Canuck, Condition Sensitive - a heartfelt THANK YOU. You know I'm serious with the use of all CAPS, too.
Here's an updated list of my '91 Fleer NEEDS after compiling some "these are on the way" responses:
#0-100: 14, 30, 86, 88
101-200: 117, 122, 161, 165, 186, 192
201-300: 207, 210
301-400: 343. 381
401-500: 402, 440, 450, 481,
501-600: 502, 529, 561, 592, 593,
601-700: 644, 649, 681, 683, 687, 689, 690, 691, 693, 694, 696,
701-720: 704, 705, 707, 711, 712
See what I mean?! You rascals........
If only the cable company were this responsive.
I'm not sure how long it will take for me to get used to the generosity of my fellow collectors. Hopefully I never will, as it is a terrific reminder of what this hobby is all about. In my last post, I shot a signal flare into the night as a call for my quest to complete the '91 Fleer set.
![]() |
| No......not FLAIR. But pizza shooters DO sound good! |
And that call was answered.
To all who have offered their help - The Lost Collector, Foul Bunt, Captain Canuck, Condition Sensitive - a heartfelt THANK YOU. You know I'm serious with the use of all CAPS, too.
Here's an updated list of my '91 Fleer NEEDS after compiling some "these are on the way" responses:
#0-100: 14, 30, 86, 88
101-200: 117, 122, 161, 165, 186, 192
201-300: 207, 210
301-400: 343. 381
401-500: 402, 440, 450, 481,
501-600: 502, 529, 561, 592, 593,
601-700: 644, 649, 681, 683, 687, 689, 690, 691, 693, 694, 696,
701-720: 704, 705, 707, 711, 712
See what I mean?! You rascals........
If only the cable company were this responsive.
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Would you accept this challenge?
AH..........set building.
If you subjected yourself to the previous post, you know that I recently dug through a brick of '91 Fleer cards - contents unknown. I recalled that I may have picked up a wax box of these cards. This would have been when I was 12, so I am not 100% certain. I was hoping that I might be decently close to completing the set. Sorted and recorded, here was the breakdown:
- NEED 280/720 cards (therefore, 62% COMPLETE)
- 110 duplicates
Hmmm.......what to do? The good news is that I still need to retrieve one "Stars" binder from my folks' home. It will certainly contain a few more cards that are currently missing (specifically, players with last names starting with "A" up through Gregg Olson) because I would have pulled the cards for the PC's in my binders.
So, it will get better, but it's still not as far along as I would have preferred. You know what, though? This is where my introduction to the blogosphere has been so wonderful. Networking, support and generous, genuine interest from other collectors in my pursuits since returning to the hobby last year give me some hope. I've already had several offers to help (Thanks to Foul Bunt, Lost Collector and Condition Sensitive!) and wouldn't this be the ultimate victory over some unfinished 'junk wax' business? Yeah......you know what?
![]() |
| I also feel this way before I eat chicken wings. |
And off we go! I've added this set to my lists, so feel free to look and see if you can unload some yellow kindling. I promise it is going to a good home. If anybody stumbles across another collector out there who managed to keep a bunch of '91 Fleers around, please let me know.
Thanks for reading and I will leave you with some of my favorite peculiar finds from this intoxicating (or toxic?) stack of wax goodness from 1991:
![]() |
| Please get well, Kid! |
![]() |
| Great swing by the HOFer |
![]() |
| Just doesn't look right |
![]() |
| Should be in '12 Topps "Walk-Offs" Subset! |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




























